As you read writings of New Physicists, you come to
conclusion that the materialist world, blossomed with Newtonian Physics, fails
to resolve the duality of deterministic and probabilistic world view. For the
resolution, one ought to come closer to philosophy. Since Materialistic Physics
fails to answer the riddles, so the Meta -physics should provide the answer.
Dileep: I suppose i.e. the reason "philosophy starts
where science ends"...but philosophy also triggers scientific thoughts,
hence together completing virtuous cycle…as such both are cornerstones of
universal consciousness
Prakash: Do you mean to say that philosophy and science are
complementary to each other?
Dileep: absolutely…but on a broader context philosophy has
larger role to play...as evident from historical incidents so far...philosophy
has been precursor to scientific development...first theoretical...later
experimental...
Prakash: But
do they act like that after the advent of industrial revolution? I do not think
so. Crass consumerism etc is all byproduct of deterministic Natural Science. Just
quoting Heisenberg “if there is much unhappiness among today's student body,
the reason is not material hardship, but the lack of trust that makes it too
difficult for the individual to give life a meaning. We must try to overcome
the isolation which threatens the individual in a world dominated by technical
expediency" in the paper “Science and Religious Truth”.
Prakash: In total agreement with your last comment.
Dileep : but philosophy as such, never inspires for
deviation from universal mankind....adherence to philosophy would only regulate the entire mankind to its
utmost stability...aberration occurs only when development takes place in
isolation to philosophical consideration....
i. e. What has happened since industrial revolution. For a system
to run efficiently we need proper regulation which takes care of each of its
stakeholders
Prakash: But that is exactly what is not taking place and
so the crisis.
Dileep: Developing a regulation certainly demands oversight
which may come from only philosophical framework....it becomes more imperative
when we are talking about entire civilization.. sure...that should be concern
of real leadership....we don’t need
modular leadership rather sustainable/holistic leadership with such universal
vision.
Parkash: Very true
No comments:
Post a Comment